Comparison
Assessment + Governance Only vs Complete Stack with Execution
Most compliance programs have assessment tools (TPRM) and governance tools (GRC), but lack a dedicated execution layer. The result: policies exist but execution is tracked in spreadsheets, evidence is scattered, and exam prep takes weeks. The complete stack includes all three layers working together.
Quick Comparison
| Feature | Assessment + Governance Only | Complete Stack with Execution |
|---|---|---|
| Assessment layer (TPRM) | Vendor risk scoring, due diligence | Same + outputs flow to execution |
| Governance layer (GRC) | Policies, frameworks, control design | Same + policies become workflows |
| Execution layer | Spreadsheets, email, manual tracking | Canarie: scheduled controls, evidence capture |
| Evidence trail | Scattered across systems | Centralized, timestamped, audit-grade |
| Exam readiness | 3-5 weeks to compile | Always ready, one-click export |
| Proof of execution | Manual reconstruction | Automatic, immutable |
When Assessment + Governance Only Works
- Early-stage compliance program
- Minimal recurring obligations
- Small team with simple requirements
When Complete Stack with Execution Works
- Established compliance program
- Multiple recurring control requirements
- Regular examinations or audits
- Growing organization
- Need to prove compliance, not just define it
Why Institutions Choose Canarie
Assessment tools tell you about risks. Governance tools define what to do. Canarie is the execution layer that makes sure it gets done and captures proof. It's the missing piece that connects policy to proof.
Frequently Asked Questions
Ready to see how Canarie compares?
Book a demo to see the difference firsthand.