Comparison

Assessment + Governance Only vs Complete Stack with Execution

Most compliance programs have assessment tools (TPRM) and governance tools (GRC), but lack a dedicated execution layer. The result: policies exist but execution is tracked in spreadsheets, evidence is scattered, and exam prep takes weeks. The complete stack includes all three layers working together.

Quick Comparison

FeatureAssessment + Governance OnlyComplete Stack with Execution
Assessment layer (TPRM)Vendor risk scoring, due diligenceSame + outputs flow to execution
Governance layer (GRC)Policies, frameworks, control designSame + policies become workflows
Execution layerSpreadsheets, email, manual trackingCanarie: scheduled controls, evidence capture
Evidence trailScattered across systemsCentralized, timestamped, audit-grade
Exam readiness3-5 weeks to compileAlways ready, one-click export
Proof of executionManual reconstructionAutomatic, immutable

When Assessment + Governance Only Works

  • Early-stage compliance program
  • Minimal recurring obligations
  • Small team with simple requirements

When Complete Stack with Execution Works

  • Established compliance program
  • Multiple recurring control requirements
  • Regular examinations or audits
  • Growing organization
  • Need to prove compliance, not just define it

Why Institutions Choose Canarie

Assessment tools tell you about risks. Governance tools define what to do. Canarie is the execution layer that makes sure it gets done and captures proof. It's the missing piece that connects policy to proof.

Calculate Your ROI

Frequently Asked Questions

Ready to see how Canarie compares?

Book a demo to see the difference firsthand.